A closer look at weather

What happens when the race gets warmer?

The temperature at the start is only part of the day. Compare how much conditions warm during the first four hours with pacing later in the race.

What the data shows

Larger temperature rises were associated with more late-race slowing.

Temperature rise in the first four hours: comparing +4.9°F with +11.5°F, the larger value was associated with about 2.1 percentage points more late-race slowing.

177 race editions · 27 courses · 3,324,934 complete finishes. Each edition has equal weight.

Source: Marathon results, weather and course data.

Compared within courses, accounting for start temperature, calendar year and the other modeled weather factors. Field composition and other differences can still matter.

The adjusted comparison

How much did slowing differ?

+2.07percentage points of late-race slowing

Temperature rise in the first four hours: +4.9°F+11.5°F

Uncertainty range: +1.53 to +2.75 percentage points. Zero means no difference.

The dot is the estimated difference. The line shows the uncertainty range; it remains above zero. The range accounts for testing three weather questions.

How to read this

Slowing compares pace over 12.43–24.85 mi with pace over 0–12.43 mi. For example, 7% slowing instead of 5% is a difference of 2 percentage points. The final 1.36 mi is excluded.

Keep in mind

The fixed four-hour window can extend beyond a faster runner’s finish. This association does not prove that warming caused a pacing change or tell an individual runner how much time they will lose.

Behind the comparison

See the race days.

Each dot represents one edition. These are the observed values before adjustment. Browse a course to see its editions; the adjusted result above remains the full-study comparison.

Showing 177 editions across all courses.

Vertical axis: median late-race slowing (%). Higher means more slowing. Each dot has the same size, regardless of field size.

View race editions and values
Race editionTemperature rise in the first four hoursLate-race slowingFinishes
Amsterdam 2012+2.7°F5.71%9,986
Amsterdam 2013+7.0°F8.72%10,871
Amsterdam 2014+4.7°F9.68%11,959
Amsterdam 2015+5.2°F5.40%12,201
Amsterdam 2016+10.8°F7.82%12,113
Amsterdam 2017+12.2°F10.22%10,942
Amsterdam 2018+11.0°F6.20%11,985
Amsterdam 2019+8.8°F5.25%13,253
Amsterdam 2021+5.0°F5.07%6,491
Amsterdam 2022+6.5°F7.36%12,458
Amsterdam 2024+3.8°F5.49%16,735
Auckland 2016+2.9°F10.11%1,541
Auckland 2017+2.7°F12.37%1,520
Auckland 2018+1.1°F7.05%915
Auckland 2019+1.8°F10.90%1,560
Austin 2017+3.8°F15.99%2,568
Austin 2018+4.0°F8.65%2,439
Austin 2019+1.8°F11.52%2,614
Barcelona 2019+17.8°F4.82%5,535
Barcelona 2025+13.5°F4.01%20,716
Barcelona 2026+10.8°F4.01%23,955
Berlin 2005+13.0°F9.18%30,211
Berlin 2006+14.0°F10.82%30,026
Berlin 2007+5.6°F7.23%32,344
Berlin 2008+10.8°F6.59%35,500
Berlin 2009+15.3°F9.90%34,704
Berlin 2010+1.6°F4.71%33,816
Berlin 2011+13.1°F7.68%27,208
Berlin 2012+9.4°F5.64%34,074
Berlin 2013+11.5°F5.09%36,283
Berlin 2014+14.2°F7.37%28,819
Berlin 2015+9.2°F6.43%36,545
Berlin 2016+13.9°F7.84%35,821
Berlin 2017+4.7°F6.83%38,815
Berlin 2018+11.2°F9.84%40,362
Berlin 2019-0.4°F6.44%43,691
Berlin 2021+11.3°F12.72%22,985
Berlin 2022+9.9°F7.27%34,666
Berlin 2023+10.4°F7.26%42,182
Berlin 2024+9.9°F5.12%53,417
Berlin 2025+9.0°F11.50%47,851
Boston 2018+6.7°F10.31%25,121
Boston 2019+11.5°F12.46%24,999
Boston 2022+3.8°F7.56%24,763
Boston 2023+5.8°F5.28%26,429
Boston 2024+14.9°F12.80%25,460
Boston 2025+5.9°F7.40%28,340
Boston 2026+6.3°F4.92%28,702
Chicago 2017+12.4°F15.96%44,009
Chicago 2018+2.3°F8.48%51,690
Chicago 2019+8.6°F8.48%51,530
Chicago 2024+1.3°F8.47%51,545
Chicago 2025+7.0°F8.61%53,619
Copenhagen 2014+4.9°F7.57%9,528
Copenhagen 2015+7.0°F8.10%9,097
Copenhagen 2016+7.0°F15.98%8,171
Copenhagen 2017+6.1°F8.38%7,960
Copenhagen 2018+11.7°F11.72%7,338
Copenhagen 2019+7.7°F11.42%10,707
Copenhagen 2022+5.2°F7.02%8,461
Copenhagen 2023+6.8°F9.20%10,109
Copenhagen 2024+2.5°F4.89%14,404
Copenhagen 2025+3.4°F4.22%18,409
Copenhagen 2026+9.4°F3.35%21,511
Dubai 2016+10.8°F14.38%1,852
Dubai 2019+11.5°F14.67%1,688
Dubai 2020+2.0°F14.16%1,824
Dubai 2023+11.5°F10.06%3,742
Dubai 2024+7.4°F10.60%1,245
Dubai 2025+7.4°F8.46%1,534
Eindhoven 2011+5.6°F3.94%1,268
Eindhoven 2012+6.7°F4.11%1,264
Eindhoven 2013+1.4°F3.96%1,277
Eindhoven 2014+11.3°F6.83%1,154
Eindhoven 2015+8.5°F4.87%1,839
Eindhoven 2016+9.5°F5.71%2,123
Eindhoven 2018+9.7°F13.98%2,012
Eindhoven 2019+9.0°F13.30%2,386
Eindhoven 2021+13.5°F4.41%1,377
Eindhoven 2022+13.9°F5.46%2,459
Eindhoven 2023+4.7°F7.16%2,866
Eindhoven 2024+2.5°F4.35%4,728
Gold Coast 2016+9.7°F14.30%5,331
Gold Coast 2017+12.6°F13.41%5,111
Gold Coast 2018+7.0°F15.94%5,712
Gold Coast 2019+3.8°F12.61%5,620
Gold Coast 2022+4.7°F8.08%3,959
Gold Coast 2023+8.3°F8.00%5,811
Gold Coast 2024+7.6°F5.48%5,692
Hamburg 2019+1.4°F2.91%3,341
Hamburg 2024+7.6°F8.74%10,481
Hamburg 2025+11.2°F5.65%10,595
Helsinki 2015-0.4°F8.18%3,356
Helsinki 2016+2.2°F7.80%2,716
Helsinki 2017-1.6°F12.29%1,781
London 2019+4.3°F11.40%41,765
London 2021+7.4°F12.27%21,929
London 2022+6.7°F12.19%30,878
London 2023+0.2°F9.07%33,381
London 2024+4.7°F8.55%46,160
London 2025+12.1°F13.75%53,796
London 2026+13.7°F11.24%56,762
Madrid 2013+8.6°F3.41%7,572
Madrid 2014+11.9°F6.32%5,873
Madrid 2015+5.8°F1.83%11,517
Madrid 2016+14.4°F5.80%9,757
Madrid 2017+17.6°F6.30%9,781
Madrid 2018+16.7°F5.54%8,310
Madrid 2019+14.9°F8.72%7,677
Madrid 2021+13.0°F10.09%2,978
Madrid 2022+12.8°F7.63%4,152
Madrid 2023+13.9°F9.45%6,914
Madrid 2024+13.1°F6.98%8,495
Madrid 2025+15.3°F8.17%9,910
Madrid 2026+13.9°F10.50%10,813
Melbourne 2015+7.2°F8.60%416
New York 2009+3.1°F11.43%42,364
New York 2010+7.9°F12.20%43,854
New York 2011+13.7°F12.58%45,929
New York 2013+4.3°F11.37%48,583
New York 2014+5.6°F12.88%42,792
New York 2015+7.0°F14.41%48,685
New York 2016+2.7°F12.55%50,546
New York 2017+5.6°F12.21%49,354
New York 2018+5.6°F13.34%51,928
New York 2019+7.4°F12.12%52,752
New York 2021+11.0°F12.41%24,617
New York 2022+7.0°F17.33%46,935
New York 2023+10.4°F13.14%50,436
New York 2024+11.7°F9.39%55,064
New York 2025+13.0°F10.63%58,339
Oslo 2016+3.1°F6.03%2,384
Oslo 2017+7.0°F8.62%1,975
Oslo 2018+5.9°F7.98%2,204
Oslo 2022+5.2°F6.82%1,788
Paris 2019+11.7°F7.29%46,903
Paris 2024+4.1°F10.63%53,067
Prague 2016+8.8°F8.26%5,732
Prague 2017+6.5°F5.61%6,452
Prague 2018+9.7°F5.79%6,921
Rotterdam 2013+9.7°F12.54%8,281
Rotterdam 2014+2.2°F7.16%10,601
Rotterdam 2015+7.2°F7.36%11,756
Rotterdam 2016+7.0°F8.60%12,740
Rotterdam 2017+13.0°F11.49%12,693
Rotterdam 2018+10.6°F13.29%13,790
Rotterdam 2019+11.9°F12.27%14,269
Rotterdam 2021+10.4°F6.06%10,632
Rotterdam 2022+5.9°F7.56%11,613
Rotterdam 2023+2.0°F4.46%16,543
Rotterdam 2024+3.1°F7.69%17,005
Singapore 2025+5.6°F14.99%8,877
Stockholm 2011-0.4°F5.51%9,924
Stockholm 20210.0°F7.88%6,952
Stockholm 2024+1.4°F12.81%16,949
Sydney 2017+14.6°F11.83%3,461
Sydney 2018+11.7°F10.05%3,552
Sydney 2019+24.5°F13.09%4,332
Valencia 2021+5.6°F3.86%12,410
Valencia 2022+7.2°F4.11%21,306
Valencia 2023+15.8°F3.47%24,578
Valencia 2024+9.5°F5.87%27,515
Warsaw 2015+6.3°F6.23%6,883
Warsaw 2016+8.6°F5.08%6,512
Warsaw 2017+4.5°F7.80%5,467
Warsaw 2018+8.8°F8.93%4,290
Washington 2008+16.0°F11.41%17,385
Washington 2009+7.4°F11.84%19,593
Washington 2010+14.2°F13.86%20,820
Washington 2011+15.1°F10.47%19,708
Washington 2012+2.0°F11.69%21,771
Washington 2013+13.7°F9.09%19,737
Washington 2014+8.3°F14.08%18,995
Washington 2015+9.7°F12.62%21,776
Washington 2016+17.8°F16.66%18,866
Washington 2017+16.7°F15.65%16,195
Washington 2018+7.4°F12.55%18,994
How we calculated this

After checking the raw timings, we excluded 40,901 otherwise plausible finishes from reviewed editions with invalid split grids, incomplete ingestion, unresolved source checks or a selected field. These source exclusions are reported separately from timing errors in the downloadable evidence.

The outcome is each edition's median individual percentage pace change from 0–12.43 mi to 12.43–24.85 mi: 100 × ((time at 24.85 mi − time at 12.43 mi) / time at 12.43 mi − 1). Positive is slowing. These are equal-distance blocks, not measured half-marathon splits; the last 1.36 mi is excluded.

Each city/year must identify exactly one race and one weather row with a valid same-year race date. Keep at least 100 complete eligible finishes per edition and weight each retained edition equally. The number of finishes is not the number of independent weather observations.

Use the producer's observed_at archive hour only when it is within 30 minutes of the supplied scheduled local start; either nearest hour is accepted at an exact half-hour tie. Temperature, dew point, humidity and wind must agree with that hour. Warming is temperature exactly four hourly readings later minus temperature at that start hour; no runner's finish time determines the window. Supplied start times may be approximate or refer to elite rather than mass starts.

Fit one prespecified joint linear model of edition median pace change, with course fixed effects, a centered linear calendar-year term, centered start temperature and its square, start dew point, first-four-hours temperature change and start wind speed. Course denotes the supplied city, not a verified historical route. Course fixed effects are removed by within-course centering.

Report each weather coefficient multiplied by that exposure's observed edition interquartile range (75th minus 25th percentile). This is a conditional regression contrast, not a prediction that sets dew point beyond the physically supported temperature range. The other modeled variables are held constant.

Uncertainty resamples whole courses with replacement, keeping every edition within the drawn course and recomputing the model. The fixed seed is 20260911; 6,000 draws produce percentile intervals at 98.333333% confidence, an approximate Bonferroni adjustment for the three screened exposures. At least 95% of draws must have full rank. Repeated runners across courses are not separately clustered.

Before seeing outcomes, require 30 editions, 10 courses, within-course exposure ranges at least half the overall IQR in at least 10 courses, and variance inflation factor no more than 10. A supported association additionally needs an interval excluding zero, an absolute IQR estimate of at least 1 percentage point and unchanged direction in every leave-one-course-out refit. A precise null requires the entire interval and every leave-one-course-out estimate strictly inside ±1 percentage point. This 1-point threshold is a prespecified practical publication threshold, not a physiological boundary or a claim that smaller changes never matter to runners. All three screen results remain in the audit, including withheld candidates.

This is an exploratory, adjusted edition-level association among eligible finishers. It does not establish a weather penalty, an individual forecast or a causal effect. Field composition, fitness, opening congestion, race organization, route changes and unmeasured conditions remain possible explanations. The opening 0–12.43 mi baseline can itself be affected by weather and congestion. Runners who did not finish or lack valid splits are not represented.

Relative humidity changes with temperature. Dew point is the modeled moisture exposure; the raw humidity percentage is retained for context. Wind speed gives no runner-specific headwind or tailwind without a valid historical route, direction and personal exposure timeline. Scheduled-start weather is not personal wave-start weather.

Use complete, strictly increasing elapsed checkpoints at 3.11, 6.21, 9.32, 12.43, 15.53, 18.64, 21.75, 24.85 and 26.22 mi. Clock strings must parse as H:MM:SS or M:SS. No missing splits are interpolated.

Remove exact duplicate race records, ignoring database IDs, ingestion timestamps and source URLs. Retain finishes from 90 minutes to 12 hours with every section between 3.22 and 32.19 minutes/mi. These quality filters can exclude genuine unusual performances; the analysis describes this eligible cohort, not every entrant.

Apply the reviewed source-quality edition exclusions for this exact export after the timing checks. Known invalid split grids, incomplete ingestion, unreconciled HOLD editions and a selected top-finisher field do not contribute to the analyses or prior benchmarks. Report source exclusions separately; an already invalid timing row is not counted twice. Missing age or recorded gender alone does not exclude an otherwise eligible finish from the overall cohort. Other sparse editions are not declared incomplete merely from their size.

Data: Marathon results, weather and course data. See the marathons, years and recorded conditions. Download all three screening results and edition values. Weather source definitions.

All three weather questions were screened together. The download retains their estimates and uncertainty, including any that were too uncertain for a separate page.